And yet we abhor the Chinese lockdown put in place due to covid. We cannot have it everyway.Agree totally with Freedom of Choice.
But this situation is not about individuals.
I live in London and have not to my knowledge had Covid despite being around people who did and travelling on busy transport systems. We have a big backlog of people waiting for urgent treatment for cancer and other life threatening dieseses due to the people who did need to be hospitalised due to Covid. These are the people i think about and i see it as my duty to help. Its very simple to think of Viruses only effecting the people who catch them. Take the AIDS virus for example and the people who died because they were given contaminated blood. Blood is used all the time in operations. We need to keep our blood healthy for people who may need it to save their life. Its a much bigger picture than some people think. Again i fully support Freedom of Choice.
It may (or may not) be a result of the spread of the omicron variance where people that had the initial vaccinations and maybe the first two boosters, but not the latest, thought it was "safe" to freely mingle, oblivious to the evolving threat. It's amazing the amount of data we have and what spins are put on it. For example, here is a graph from data provided by CDC for last March:Interesting.
China is way behind alot of Countries regarding many aspects of how you can counter the spread and its effects. It is a Police State. I feel for the People who live there. This may well be counter productive for their " leader " which can only be a good thing for the People and the rest of the World.And yet we abhor the Chinese lockdown put in place due to covid. We cannot have it everyway.
If you are referring to the pie charts, it makes sense to me. In Sept 2021 there were many more unvaxxed,l than now, so deaths would weigh toward the unvaxxed. In 2022, there are more vaxxed, plus you have all the people that died no longer eligible for death, so a smaller pool of high-risk. That said, seeing the total numbers for each chart would be helpful - the percentages are just a piece of the puzzle, err pie.Those two charts seem to show completely different results. Both are supposed to come from the CDC. I can't help but think at least one of them is false or misleading in some way.
Got a link? I frankly don't believe this came from the CDC. Fake News as they say.
Social responsibility is an important factor here that I agree with. People are too selfish these days and they can find anything they want on the internet to justify their opinion. Just look at the flat earthers!Agree totally with Freedom of Choice.
But this situation is not about individuals.
I live in London and have not to my knowledge had Covid despite being around people who did and travelling on busy transport systems. We have a big backlog of people waiting for urgent treatment for cancer and other life threatening dieseses due to the people who did need to be hospitalised due to Covid. These are the people i think about and i see it as my duty to help. Its very simple to think of Viruses only effecting the people who catch them. Take the AIDS virus for example and the people who died because they were given contaminated blood. Blood is used all the time in operations. We need to keep our blood healthy for people who may need it to save their life. Its a much bigger picture than some people think. Again i fully support Freedom of Choice.
Wait . . . . what? The Earth isn't flat?. . . . Just look at the flat earthers!
It is if your in Florida.Wait . . . . what? The Earth isn't flat?
It is a retirement State so makes sense.It is if your in Florida.
Yup, they keep the bike from dying, but not breaking down.So you are saying BMW Extended Warranties are like a Booster then ?
I just put gas in the S10 to stop it dying.Yup, they keep the bike from dying, but not breaking down.
Got a link? I frankly don't believe this came from the CDC. Fake News as they say.
Thanks. This data tends to contradict the pie charts posted earlier, and supports the effectiveness of the vaccines. Don't confuse the two shades of green. This data is different as shows incidences of infection, not deaths, so is not supportive or even comparable to the bogus pie charts. Only someone who does not understand the data would use this information to support the prior false information and hope the person(s) the data is presented to is equally ignorant. Someone wishing to promote a conspiracy theory created or adulterated those pie charts.View attachment 97251
Right there on the cdc website.
The data doesn't support the vaccine theory. But keep on seeing those invisible clothes.
If your 65 and under in good physical condition, why mess around with an experimental shot. Especially one that the data shows loses its effectiveness in less than 90 days?