The Darkside.......

RCinNC

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 30, 2014
Messages
2,879
Location
North Carolina
Re: Car Tires - What people think are the negatives or want to debate

Tempesc said:
I keep seeing the phrase "darksider". Is there a name for the other viewpoint?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I've never heard an official term. I say "anti-darksiders", but admittedly that sounds kind of odd and science-fictiony.
 

groundhog

New Member
Joined
Apr 22, 2015
Messages
326
Location
Winchester, England
Re: Car Tires - What people think are the negatives or want to debate

Tempesc said:
I keep seeing the phrase "darksider". Is there a name for the other viewpoint?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Yes..........sane ;)
 

Checkswrecks

Ungenear to broked stuff
Staff member
Global Moderator
2011 Site Supporter
Joined
Mar 7, 2011
Messages
11,529
Location
Damascus, MD
Re: Car Tires - What people think are the negatives or want to debate

FredBGG said:
What is the tires ability to bite again if it loses traction due to too much contact with the cases etc?

This question and the locked-tire skid mark with the highside in the photo you showed earlier have nothing to do with tire type. They both relate to the following quote about the peril of re-acquiring rear wheel traction, and the quote is verbatim from the MSF Basic Rider Handbook:


"Do not release the rear brake pedal when the rear wheel is not in line with the front wheel. If the rear wheel stops skidding and starts to roll, the motorcycle will quickly straighten and you can be thrown off in front of the motorcycle. This is called a high- side fall or crash."


FredBGG said:
What the photo shows is rider stupidity. It s really irresponsible to lean at that level with that type of bike,

Since when is dragging parts on a bagger or cruiser stupid or irresponsible? It's pretty common. The rider in your Mulholland video didn't lose control till he was distracted or lost confidence when his foot caught and even then, technically the bike may possibly have been saved till he left the pavement.


A big part of success and safety is knowing what tire works for which bike and how the rider will use it, which is why I split this debate from the factually-oriented thread in the Modifications section. We had a rider on the east coast named Yellow Wolf who was one of the most consistently fast riders on the Dragon and he did it on a GoldWing. Here is a photo of the Falken car tire and one of the classic videos of him.


His consistency didn't come from stupidity and years of doing this illustrated that the secrets to success were knowing the tire (nothing to do with type) and maintaining control which means to refrain from being irresponsible. Met him once at the gas station there and he was a super friendly guy too. Listen and you will hear 'Wolf's buddy on the chase 'Wing ground out occasionally. Rather than being stupid or irresponsible, the friend also knew where his equipment's limits were and respected them.


www.youtube.com/watch?v=37XLJNLpzxQ&feature=youtu.be


Falken car tire visible:
 

Spaggy

Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2014
Messages
186
Location
Canada
Re: Car Tires - What people think are the negatives or want to debate

Near the end of WW2, the Nazis experimented with putting car tires on their motorcycles and leaving them where the advancing Russians would find and use the bikes. The idea was that the resulting carnage would annihilate them all. The Nazis never implemented the plan because there were too many of them killed just installing the car tires and pushing them around the Nazi garage. Incidentally, that's where the name "darkside" originated.
 

groundhog

New Member
Joined
Apr 22, 2015
Messages
326
Location
Winchester, England
Re: Car Tires - What people think are the negatives or want to debate

Spaggy said:
Near the end of WW2, the Nazis experimented with putting car tires on their motorcycles and leaving them where the advancing Russians would find and use the bikes. The idea was that the resulting carnage would annihilate them all. The Nazis never implemented the plan because there were too many of them killed just installing the car tires and pushing them around the Nazi garage. Incidentally, that's where the name "darkside" originated.
::025::
 

Judd

Endeavor to Perserver
Joined
Apr 28, 2012
Messages
102
Location
N.E. Ga.
Re: Car Tires - What people think are the negatives or want to debate

Gonna post up my experiences running a CT here.

I was planning a long trip, two up and loaded on my DL650 and I wanted a tire that would make it there and back so minimum 15K miles or so. There is not a single bike tire that would give that sorta mileage in a size that would work on my DL650's rim. The closest MT that would met that criteria and fit would probably be a ME880 and it's close and it sucks. I've tried one, you give up a lot of traction especially in the wet. Even so, I was considering it, even if it didn't last the trip.

Well, I had been noticing CTs of bikes for quite some time, mostly Goldwings and the like and initially, I thought to my self that it had to suck. It looked like it would suck, everything about the idea sounds like it would suck. I used to club race a bit in WERA and most of my experience is from a sportbike background so again, the idea sounded all wrong. Yet,,,, time and time again when I was talk with people that had tried it I was getting positive or at the very least, mediocre reports. Never, not once did I have a report of a CT causing a catastrophic issue yet I here it from the chicken littles every time the topic comes up. Do I suppose a person riding a CT has wrecked? Absolutely. But was the wreck directly related to the CT???? Dunno, but I doubt it as the internets would be popping like code on ham radio if something like that could be substantiated. But, all the bikes I had been seeing all these years has been Goldwings and the like and they don't have a lot of cornering clearance right? Well, yea, right but in the right hands a certain yellow Goldwing running a CT can haul the mail up and down the Tail of the Dragon. There is also a guy riding around my neck of the woods {N.Ga. /129 Blood Mountain area} on a slick black Wing that was heavily modded and gave many a squidlet a hard time up on Blood Mountain so I talked to him and again, he admitted he liked the MT tire best in the twisties and when he knew he would be coming up just to play he would pop a MT out back but he stated that it really didn't hurt much at all just playing in the hills. At the time I thought what the hell, those damned Wings can't lean anyway so while a CT might well work on them, no way it'll work on a bike that really leans over. I "thought" those things, I had the manners and compassion not to piss in other's people's corn flakes. The whole time I sorta thought those Darksiders were a weird bunch and it wasn't until I rode with the dude on the black Wind did I start to come around.

So,,,, that's all Wings, touring bikes and cruisers,,,,,, what about my damned DL???? Well, I started reading everything I could about a CT on a DL650 and once I saw a CT that sorta became the "go to" tire for darksiders, I desided to experiment but my luck,,,, no General Exclaims available and the trip was looming so I decided to just roll the dice and buy a CT and just try it. I bought a Falken Futura of something like that in a 205/55/17 size and the next couple of days as spent trying to mount the damned thing. I learned a little trick that made mounting possible, even easy so the next thing was riding. I was scared shitless that the beads would fly off from all the internet experts pontificating on and on about shit they knew nothing about so I popped the max amount of pressure that the tire was rated for and then some,,,, I had 50psi in it and no, the beads didn't fly off. I marked the tire and wheel assy. so I could tell immediately if the tire slid on the rim and I rode down my 1/4 mile long dirt road. It was absolutely terrible! I thought to myself that if this was as good as it gets, I just wasted 100$. At the end of the dirt drive I let 10psi out then took off for my local rider's hang out {Rider's Hill} that about 15-20 minutes away.

I rode very tentatively the whole time, gradually getting used to it. The 40psi was better, still sucked though. I stopped at Rider's Hill and commenced to be ridiculed. No problem,,,, thick skin and all and so what, I was just experimenting, wasn't so sure it would work anyway right? Well, Rider's Hill is at the start of the fun stuff on Hwy 60 just north of Dahlonega Ga. and I was getting ready to see how that CT worked in the twisties. I let another 10psi out and took off with 30psi in it. Better still, actually started getting somewhat comfy on it but still didn't really trust it. I stopped at the hippi hiker shack up on Blood Mountain {Hwy 129 at the Appalachian Trail crossing} and let 10psi more out. I turned around, went back down to Desoto Falls turn in and by god,,, not bad. I did think that maybe 20psi was too low and popped it back up to 25psi for the trip back to the hippi hiker shack. Bingo,,,, perfect!

I also ride my DL650 a lot off tarmac Matter of fact, I modded it quite a bit, had nearly 2 inches more travel in the front {DR/DL hybrid fork assy.}, bout an inch more in the rear and the whole bike was raised 1.5-2 inches giving more ground clearance than a stock DL650. Considering the aftermarket springs and better damping over stock,,,, there was no wallowing or packing down like stock so it really has a lot better cornering clearance than stock. I run Shinko 705s normally and that's what was on the front at the time, not the best tire choice for hauling ass in the twisties. While I have never had the front 705 slide, it does get very vague at the limits which coincidentally is right where my pegs start to tick down,,,,, remember that part about having more cornering clearance than a stock DL though. Well, after a day of playing up there, experimenting with tire pressures, that CT had more left when that 705 had be worrying. The front 705 was the limiting factor, not the rear. I did succeed on spinning the rim inside the tire,,,,, when I let all the air out seeing if it could be used as a run flat. Nope! But with pressures as low as 10psi, the tire didn't slip even a bit. At 5psi it barely slipped a bit and I was slamming on the rear brake and clutching up wheelies trying to get it to slip.

As it was, I didn't get to go on that dream trip so it was used as a "worst case scenario" test and I beat on it hard. That tire lasted me 13K miles but to put that 13K and I was hard as hell on it, often running fairly low pressures trying to make it work better off tarmac. I sorta settled on 22-23psi as a compromise and left it there unless I was riding two up where I settled on 30psi. To put that 13K in perspective, I normally get 20K or so out of a D.I.D. chain,,,, I wasted that one in roughly 10K miles, so yea,,,,,very hard on it during that time. I'm betting a rear 705 wouldn't have went 2.5-3K miles used the way that CT was.

So, what did I learn experimenting with a CT on my DL650 for 13K miles?

I learned that some CTs can be a PITA to install!

I learned that you absolutely have to experiment with tire pressure.

It works and works amazingly well in certain conditions. It doesn't look like it'll work but it does.

It actually has more traction in most conditions {straight up, cornering, dry and wet} than the MTs I would use on my DL. Does it have more than a Pilot Power? Prolly not, but I don't run Pilot Powers on my DL650. If you do, maybe the DL ain't the best bike of choice for you though.

Draw backs? Yep, there are a few.

It's heavy as hell. Just the tire weighed roughly what my DL's rim and Kenda Big Block assy. weighed. Heavier tires have draw backs. It feels like I lost 5-10hp when I first put it on, got used to it quickly though and wasn't noticeable after awhile. Secondly, it's unsprung weight which does hurt handling. There is a difference between "handling" and "traction" for those that don't know. At the ragged edges of play, the CT just doesn't feel as good as the MT. In rough stuff, the weight will overwhelm my aftermarket shock. I suppose the limits would come sooner with the crappy OEM shock I took off. But please remember,,,,, I'm really hauling the mail at this point, I ride a lot, have raced and I did quite a bit of open track play. No, I'm no Valentino Rossi but I am fairly quick on most any bike, fast than many, slightly slower than a few. When the CT becomes an issue when playing in the twisties, I assure you, I'm moving along quite well. Most folks don't ride their DLs as quickly. If anyone here knows Bluelighting on Adv Rider,,,, he has also tried a CT and he is also fast as hell on his DL650, he stated the CT wasn't a significant factor in cornering/handling either.

Another thing the CT is not good at,,,, off tarmac stuff. The huge width of the CT means it hits every rock, rut and root when off tarmac. This moved the bike around and will at times, move you off your preferred line. Also, on dirt roads with a lot of washboard, the CT is at a disadvantage compared to the MT. On S. Ga./Fla. sugar sand it did better than a 705 would. On mud, everything this side of a full on knobby sucks and the CT is no exception. I ride a lot of this stuff and the CT sucked in this environment so when it wore out, I didn't go back with a CT.

That's it. The whole of it. In my experience, the CT is not the "End All" option. It doesn't do everything well. It does work better than expected in some applications, great in some and not so good in others.

Would I pop a CT on the back of a Gixxer 1K and head to the mountains? Hell no. No more than I would put a TKC on there. Putting a ME880 on the back of a Gixxer 1K would suck too right? There you have it then, the CT is a compromise tire just like all the other MTs out there. Have some common sense, use a CT in the right application and it works well. Mounted up and used in the wrong application and it would suck. No rocket science,,,, no magic,,,,,,,, juss common sense folks.
 

RCinNC

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 30, 2014
Messages
2,879
Location
North Carolina
Re: Car Tires - What people think are the negatives or want to debate

Yes, Fred, I hear what I'm saying.

Your claim is that it isn't safe., but the argument you keep falling back on is that they aren't better than motorcycle tires or safe for use on a motorcycle, or else the motorcycle tire manufacturers would make car style tires for motorcycles. It doesn't matter that "plenty of darksiders claim that car tires are better", because that isn't the crux of the argument. You've made the same repeated claim over and over that they aren't safe, but none of your arguments support that. The fact that motorcycle tire makers don't make car style tires for bikes is irrelevant to your argument, as is your claim that some darksiders claim they are better. Motorcycle tire manufacturers don't make them because they don't have to; the tires they make are perfectly adequate for the job they do. The argument here isn't that car tires are better; the argument is that they are a safe, adequate substitution for a motorcycle tire that has some advantages over a standard motorcycle tire. You say they're unsafe, so offer something to support your argument beyond your opinion (unless you are an engineer in this particular discipline and have actual credibility to make that assessment). Guys who do the C/T thing support their opinion that they are a safe alternative to a motorcycle tire with every mile they ride. What exactly is your particular field of experience, or even personal hands on experience, that qualifies you to pronounce this as unsafe in the face of a lot of evidence to the contrary? On three different motorcycle forums I participate on, there are threads full of guys who have personal experience with this topic, have logged countless safe miles on car tire equipped bikes, and have never had an issue. On those same threads there are guys who present all sorts of opinions why it's crazy, and unsafe, and fraught with peril, but the one thing all of them have in common is that none of them can ever present anything to back up their assertion that equals the same weight and credibility as the real world experience of those darkside guys. Not one verifiable instance of this catastrophic failure that is always predicted, not one actual expert opinion from someone qualified to offer that opinion.

The scientific method for investigation requires that you postulate a hypothesis, you test the hypothesis, and you report your results. That's what the darkside guys do, every day they roll down the road. You've postulated the hypothesis that a C/T on a bike is unsafe; if you want your argument to have more weight than an unsubstantiated opinion, then you either have to take the next two steps, or else produce the results of someone who has. If you come up with something with more credibility that you've already put forth, then I'd love to hear it; otherwise, your position has no foundation (beyond mere opinion) and debating it is meaningless.
 

La Knee

New Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2015
Messages
277
Location
East PA
Re: Car Tires - What people think are the negatives or want to debate

WHAT ABOUT THE DOUBLE DARKSIDE ? Running a rear tire on the front mounted in the wrong direction !!



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

catang5oh

Member
Joined
Feb 18, 2015
Messages
95
Location
Alabama
Car Tires - What people think are the negatives or want to debate

Wow, just spent 2 hrs of my life reading what I thought was a bunch of politicians telling us what is and isn't good for us!

Funny thing, the tuner car guys are busy installing motorcycle tires on Civics. What the hell, I have ran several, and handling to me wasn't much different. Do I preach it, he'll no. Same as Rotella, it's a f, ing Diesel engine oil, but guess what if you like it have at it. Cheapskate, I don't think so. I think it is the perfect example of America at its finest, do what the hell you feel like and don't worry about everyone else's choices. Unless they affect you, FYYFF.
 

shrekonwheels

New Member
Joined
Jun 22, 2014
Messages
772
Location
Montana
Re: Car Tires - What people think are the negatives or want to debate

Checkswrecks said:
This question and the locked-tire skid mark with the highside in the photo you showed earlier have nothing to do with tire type. They both relate to the following quote about the peril of re-acquiring rear wheel traction, and the quote is verbatim from the MSF Basic Rider Handbook:


"Do not release the rear brake pedal when the rear wheel is not in line with the front wheel. If the rear wheel stops skidding and starts to roll, the motorcycle will quickly straighten and you can be thrown off in front of the motorcycle. This is called a high- side fall or crash."



Since when is dragging parts on a bagger or cruiser stupid or irresponsible? It's pretty common. The rider in your Mulholland video didn't lose control till he was distracted or lost confidence when his foot caught and even then, technically the bike may possibly have been saved till he left the pavement.


A big part of success and safety is knowing what tire works for which bike and how the rider will use it, which is why I split this debate from the factually-oriented thread in the Modifications section. We had a rider on the east coast named Yellow Wolf who was one of the most consistently fast riders on the Dragon and he did it on a GoldWing. Here is a photo of the Falken car tire and one of the classic videos of him.


His consistency didn't come from stupidity and years of doing this illustrated that the secrets to success were knowing the tire (nothing to do with type) and maintaining control which means to refrain from being irresponsible. Met him once at the gas station there and he was a super friendly guy too. Listen and you will hear 'Wolf's buddy on the chase 'Wing ground out occasionally. Rather than being stupid or irresponsible, the friend also knew where his equipment's limits were and respected them.
YellowWolf is annomoly and not indicative of the average person, or hell even of most advanced riders.
He knows the road, his bike, and its limitations inside and out. He also rides at similar speeds where as lightly dragging is common.
It is not advisable for anyone to drag parts, as you well known for the most part it will lead to a very bad place.

You are so determined to win the debate you are willing to risk other riders lives, shameful, absolutely shameful on every level. Especially coming from a man who investigates accidents and I believe you also taught, or teach MSF as well.
 

Judd

Endeavor to Perserver
Joined
Apr 28, 2012
Messages
102
Location
N.E. Ga.
Re: Car Tires - What people think are the negatives or want to debate

shrekonwheels said:
YellowWolf is annomoly and not indicative of the average person, or hell even of most advanced riders.
He knows the road, his bike, and its limitations inside and out. He also rides at similar speeds where as lightly dragging is common.
It is not advisable for anyone to drag parts, as you well known for the most part it will lead to a very bad place.

You are so determined to win the debate you are willing to risk other riders lives, shameful, absolutely shameful on every level. Especially coming from a man who investigates accidents and I believe you also taught, or teach MSF as well.
While Yellow Wolf might be an anomaly in so much as his speed on 129,,,,,, he is not an outlier at all when it comes to running a CT on a bike perfectly safely. Many, many people do it all the time, again,,,,, if you had an instance where a CT was the over riding cause of an accident,,,,, it would sweep the internet like a wild fire in Kalifornia. I've also noticed that most of the folks that tend to run a CT or at least try one are the more experienced riders.

A lot of people just don't have confidence in their abilities to ride much less to notice small changes and react to those changes. I can understand that completely because I was just like that many, many years ago when I was young and racing. I just "had to have" the "in tires". The tires the "fast guys" were running. There have been times when I couldn't run my preferred tires or the preferred I had on at the time were compromised due to wear or heat cycling and I was slower, not just a little bit slower,,,, a shit load slower. To the point of not making sense. Many, many people are like that because they ride with confidence in their equipment, not so much in their skills. Often, these folks don't have the ability to make mundane suspension changes much less hugely changing things up by swapping whole front ends or the like. The whole time I was racing, I was like that. I had to have the "in tire", I had to have the "experts" adjust my suspension for me and eventually, I grew the balls to make mundane damping and preload adjustments but I needed an expert to get me in the ball park. I did my best to start every race on newly scuffed tires,,,,,,,,, cost me a damned fortune for stupid plastic trophies.

I got hurt bad in a completely different accident {truck crash where I ended up with three fused vertabra, several cracked and damaged in addition. When the docs fixed my back, they stole my balls,,,,, when I came back, I was slow as hell. Never could get back to with-in a second of so of my pre wreck times. Completely lost my confidence and no matter what "in tires" I mounted, I couldn't replicate my times. I quit, quite riding completely for a few years then got back into it. Went right back to sportbikes and started doing trackdays immediately with in a month or two of starting back. Thing was, this time I was on a R1 and I just didn't have the money to waste on the "in tires" much less swapping them out all the timeso I started experimenting.

I generally didn't experiment too much with the front but I would try all manner of stuff on the rear. During a few years of track day experimentation I learned to adapt to less than perfect tires, especially on the rear. So what, your rear is a super hard endurance slick, just don't feed in as much throttle on the exits. So what that the tire you have out back was too soft, you over heated it and you are laying darkies outta every corner to the point of chunking big chunks off it, slow it down a couple of notches, maybe even come in early,,,, adapt and learn.

Saying that, I have tried all sorta combos on the track, the road and off tarmac that supposedly won't work but did. Sometimes the combos sucked, most times they were acceptable as long as you noted the limitations, at times the combo worked better than you woulda ever imagined. If you don't have the confidence and self control to experiment, don't. I just wish that those that don't wouldn't stretch the bubble gum with stories of the sky falling, nuns dying and kittens being maimed all because one supposed dumbass has the audacity to experiment. That crap about being worried one of those dumbass darksiders will run into the worry wart when their experiment inevitably goes haywire is just that,,,, crap.

When I first saw people running CTs, I thought they were crazy too. I just didn't feel the need to ridicule them, cross post on different forums and make up reasons of "public safety" as to why they were crazy. I just noted they were running them, asked a few questions and went along my way.
 

Judd

Endeavor to Perserver
Joined
Apr 28, 2012
Messages
102
Location
N.E. Ga.
Re: Car Tires - What people think are the negatives or want to debate

Spaggy said:
Near the end of WW2, the Nazis experimented with putting car tires on their motorcycles and leaving them where the advancing Russians would find and use the bikes. The idea was that the resulting carnage would annihilate them all. The Nazis never implemented the plan because there were too many of them killed just installing the car tires and pushing them around the Nazi garage. Incidentally, that's where the name "darkside" originated.
:)) :)) :))
 

dcstrom

Well-Known Member
Founding Member
2011 Site Supporter
Joined
Dec 16, 2010
Messages
2,035
Re: Car Tires - What people think are the negatives or want to debate

I can't believe this discussion goes on for 4 pages. The only place for car tires on a motorcycle is if it doesn't have to lean, like when there is a sidecar fitted. Otherwise, there is a really big clue in the phrase "car tires" - notice the first word?
 

Checkswrecks

Ungenear to broked stuff
Staff member
Global Moderator
2011 Site Supporter
Joined
Mar 7, 2011
Messages
11,529
Location
Damascus, MD
Re: Car Tires - What people think are the negatives or want to debate

shrekonwheels said:
YellowWolf is annomoly and not indicative of the average person, or hell even of most advanced riders.
He knows the road, his bike, and its limitations inside and out. He also rides at similar speeds where as lightly dragging is common.
It is not advisable for anyone to drag parts, as you well known for the most part it will lead to a very bad place.
Rather than an anomaly, I found him to be a bright person who could listen and apply what he learned. He had a lot of experience (170,000 miles) on that bike and on that road.

I agree that dragging parts is not advisable. But I'm also aware, as you seem to be, that for some types of motorcycle it is very common and actually hard to not do. It's also why floorboard, foot pegs, and some other parts are (or should be) hinged.

The bottom line is that it's always always always up to the rider to not come into a curve too fast for whatever type of motorcycle he is riding.

shrekonwheels said:
You are so determined to win the debate you are willing to risk other riders lives, shameful, absolutely shameful on every level. Especially coming from a man who investigates accidents and I believe you also taught, or teach MSF as well.
My point hasn't been to win a debate, it's been to address gut reaction and factual errors and flaws in some of the arguments presented. It's been recognition that regardless of what any one of us individuals think, car tires are in use. I do believe that for you can't deny or directly control, then learn and educate. This goes both for what works and what does not.

What you seem to have missed was been that I've made points both ways. While the debate has been kinda fun, note where I also supported the anti argument by:
1. Pointing out more than once that the rims and tires are designed to different standards.
2. Pointing out that I personally (implied endorsement) continue to use motorcycle tires.
3. And that handling properties are changed by any non-OEM tires, meaning that the entire range of operation needs to be re-examined.
 

2112

It's pronounced 'Twenty-one-twelve'
2014 Site Supporter
Joined
Oct 6, 2014
Messages
1,387
Location
Northumberland, UK
Re: Car Tires - What people think are the negatives or want to debate

Dogdaze said:
Not sure if that has any speed rating Bry???
I thought the 'thirty' probably was the speed limit - in KM's !
 

loftybob

Active Member
Joined
Jul 23, 2015
Messages
146
Location
Australia
Re: Car Tires - What people think are the negatives or want to debate

I have logged up over 100,000 Km's using car tyres on my high performance, and touring bikes.

No troubles, no accidents, just massive grip, and no punctures.

My Triumphs are all insured with Shannons as having a car tyre fitted.






The only people that should be debating this, are the riders that have used them.
 
Top