offcamber said:
I understand what your saying however my reference really was that Versys is designed as a sport bike not a touring bike but the S10 is designed to be a touring bike which implies loading it with gear. One would think that the bike designed for the load would handle better when loaded than one that doesn't. Obviously that's not the case,
I'll also add the suspension never bottomed out...so it wasn't over taxed and beleive me the roads around here can bottom out a suspension. My only real complaint was the low speed handling...turning off the road to parking lot...that kinda thing...didn't feel that stable.
I can certainly see your point, but again, let's not forget a couple of relative points... Like factory claimed weights (without side cases or gear):
Kawasaki Versys - 454.2 lbs
Yamaha Super Tenere - 575 lbs
That's a whopping 120.8 lbs difference, or over 21% heavier.
Then there's that wheelbase difference again of literally 5 inches (60.6 - 55.7 = 4.9"), or over 8%. Longer is more stable at speed, but harder to turn at low speeds.
Another important difference is the ground clearance of each bike, which is fairly indicative of how high off the ground their engines (the bike's heaviest single component) are... The Versys has 7.1 inches between the ground an it's underslung engine, while the big Yamaha has 8.7 inches of clearance for its similarly mounted motor. That's a difference of 1.6", or 18%. The Yamaha also carries one more gallon of fuel (6.0 gallons vs 5.0). Since gasoline weighs about 6 lbs per gallon you are potentially carrying another 6 lbs high up on the motorcycle some of the time when you turning into the parking lot.
Last but not least there is the steering geometry of each bike... The Kawasaki Versys has a rake of 25 degrees with 4.3 inches of trail. For the Yamaha the measurements are 28 degrees with trail of 4.96 inches. More rake and trail means slower, more ponderous steering, especially at low, parking lot speeds... and the Yamaha has 11% more rake and over 14% more trail.
So, here we have a bike that weighs 21% more, has an 8% longer wheelbase, has it's heaviest lump of metal 18% higher off the ground, has 11% more rake and 14% more trail...
It's no real surprise that it's going to handle a bit more ponderously at low speeds... Actually it should handle about 14.4% slower and more ponderously at low speeds if you run the numbers. That's a fairly significant amount, but that's the trade-off for more power, more stability, more off-road ground clearance, more wheel travel, more load capacity, more ergonomic room, etc.
Just FYI...
Dallara
~