New ECU Flash Option: DIY FLASHING

avc8130

Active Member
Joined
Jan 29, 2012
Messages
3,269
Location
North NJ
Dallara said:
Granted, but still the most effective solution is direct ECU programming. That's pretty self-evident.

Besides that, in this particular and very specific case, the solution you and Chris have come up with is almost "open source", where no one is actively marketing something simply to sell something. Sure, you have to buy the componentry you mention above, but that's to allow you to program and all parameters of the ECU, not just to adjust fuel. You're not actively marketing it, and neither is Chris at FT. It's there if you want it... No hype. No magazine ad campaigns. No multiple of dealers, who may or may not know how to properly tune it, trying to sell it as a "cure all"...

It'll sure be fun to see where it goes from here. I have to admit, I'm becoming more and more intrigued by the minute to send my ECU to Chris, get the re-flash back-up done, and then get the hardware/software... Just to poke around and see what's in there!

But damn, I only use Mac's these days, and dumped all my dual-boot and emulation software a few years ago when I stopped using any PC legacy programs and the Technoresearch VDST ECU software.

I really don't want to have to buy any more Windows stuff!!! ::025::

Dallara



~
If you can stumble across a PC, you can have the software. It is there to "try before you buy".

The only thing Chris protects is the USB cables.

ac
 

jaeger22

Member
2012 Site Supporter
2014 Site Supporter
Joined
Jul 1, 2012
Messages
358
Location
Orlando, FL
Let me know when you have the cable installed and start playing with the software.

When you install the harness, I found it was quite tedious to get ALL of the pins lined up in the connector and get the lock down. The only real tip I have is: make sure the pins are ALL THE WAY IN. The lock won't click unless they are. Then give EACH AND EVERY wire a tug after you set the lock to make sure they are set properly...INCLUDING THE ONES YOU DON'T THINK YOU TOUCHED!!!!

Make sure you get a good splice on the black wire, or just put an eyelet on it and run it to the battery negative.
Thanks for the tips AC! I have worked with this type of connector and locking pins before and you are right, they are a bit pf a PIA. I didn't even think about checking the existing pins to make sure I don't dislodge any of them. Good call. I will make sure to do that.
I plan to solder all the connections but will have to see exactly how when I get into it.
Thanks again,
John
 

avc8130

Active Member
Joined
Jan 29, 2012
Messages
3,269
Location
North NJ
jaeger22 said:
Thanks for the tips AC! I have worked with this type of connector and locking pins before and you are right, they are a bit pf a PIA. I didn't even think about checking the existing pins to make sure I don't dislodge any of them. Good call. I will make sure to do that.
I plan to solder all the connections but will have to see exactly how when I get into it.
Thanks again,
John
John,

There is only 1 connection not completely done for you. You will have a bare black wire from the harness to deal with. You can either tap it to the black w/ blue wire in the ECU harness as directed in the manual (a Scotchlock is included, I chose a Posi-Tap, soldering is always welcome) OR you can put an eyelet on it and just run it right to a good ground.

All of the other wires come pre-crimped with ECU connector pins.

ac
 

Ron_Luning

Active Member
Founding Member
Joined
Dec 9, 2010
Messages
143
Location
Ellicott City, MD
I just ordered a kit from flash-tune. I broke a bone in my foot last saturday so I won't be able to ride for possibly several months. Perfect time to screw around with this stuff (maybe even sneak in a casted test ride).
 

avc8130

Active Member
Joined
Jan 29, 2012
Messages
3,269
Location
North NJ
Ron_Luning said:
I just ordered a kit from flash-tune. I broke a bone in my foot last saturday so I won't be able to ride for possibly several months. Perfect time to screw around with this stuff (maybe even sneak in a casted test ride).
I hope it's your right foot...we have linked brakes not no jockey shift!

ac
 

Tremor38

All roads fair game...all game outta the way!
2011 Site Supporter
2012 Site Supporter
Joined
Apr 28, 2011
Messages
2,562
Location
Aomori, Japan
I've been getting caught up with reading this thread and really like the idea of having this capability. Of primary concern to me is being able to flash back to the stock EU map when inspection time rolls around. Too bad Flash-Tune can only provide a backup of what's currently on your ECU. I have the Diapason flash, and would have fun playing with that, but would really like an OEM EU map as well. I checked the map sharing section at Flash tune, but there's nothing being shared among S10 owners yet. Hopefully someone will send theirs in (stock EU flashed ECU). 8) would love to have both backups.

Sent from my SC-03E using Tapatalk 2
 

avc8130

Active Member
Joined
Jan 29, 2012
Messages
3,269
Location
North NJ
Tenerator12 said:
I've been getting caught up with reading this thread and really like the idea of having this capability. Of primary concern to me is being able to flash back to the stock EU map when inspection time rolls around. Too bad Flash-Tune can only provide a backup of what's currently on your ECU. I have the Diapason flash, and would have fun playing with that, but would really like an OEM EU map as well. I checked the map sharing section at Flash tune, but there's nothing being shared among S10 owners yet. Hopefully someone will send theirs in (stock EU flashed ECU). 8) would love to have both backups.

Sent from my SC-03E using Tapatalk 2
You get the OEM map from Flash Tune when you buy the interface.

When you buy the interface, you automatically get access to 2 maps: Stock ECU and their "91 pump gas map".

You would also have access to your flash if you send in your ECU and let them pull the file.

I'm 99% sure FT has the EU stock map and you would get that with your interface.

Of course nothing is being shared...everyone is too caught up with the ECU-U gen 2 magic. Once a few more guys get the interfaces and make some maps, there will be more.

ac
 

3putt

2012 Yukon Rally attendee
Founding Member
2012 Site Supporter
2014 Site Supporter
Joined
Oct 17, 2010
Messages
1,126
Location
Bossier City, La.
I'm having great success with the GuzziDiag (free) reader, writer and using TunerPro (free version) to modify the maps. I had a big flat spot below 3500 rpm on the Griso, turns out there was NO advance and too much fuel. Trimmed some fuel out and put in some advance to sorta fair into the rest of the map. Presto, no more flat spot!

I wonder who writes the factory maps, damn! Must be just trying to make EPA guidelines.

Working on trimming a little fuel off in the cruise zone of 65 to 75 mph to get a little better MPG.

If they had this when I had the Super Ten, I would be all over it.
 

twinrider

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 28, 2011
Messages
1,882
Location
Yokohama
Tenerator12 said:
Of primary concern to me is being able to flash back to the stock EU map when inspection time rolls around.
No need to go back to the stock mapping, the catalyst will clean up the exhaust good enough to pass inspection as is. Have already been though this on my reflashed Harley and passed no prob...
 

avc8130

Active Member
Joined
Jan 29, 2012
Messages
3,269
Location
North NJ
twinrider said:
No need to go back to the stock mapping, the catalyst will clean up the exhaust good enough to pass inspection as is. Have already been though this on my reflashed Harley and passed no prob...
Either way, with the FT interface returning to stock takes <5 mins.

ac
 

Tremor38

All roads fair game...all game outta the way!
2011 Site Supporter
2012 Site Supporter
Joined
Apr 28, 2011
Messages
2,562
Location
Aomori, Japan
avc8130 said:
You get the OEM map from Flash Tune when you buy the interface.

When you buy the interface, you automatically get access to 2 maps: Stock ECU and their "91 pump gas map".

You would also have access to your flash if you send in your ECU and let them pull the file.

I'm 99% sure FT has the EU stock map and you would get that with your interface.

Of course nothing is being shared...everyone is too caught up with the ECU-U gen 2 magic. Once a few more guys get the interfaces and make some maps, there will be more.

ac
Thanks, that's very helpful info. I'll exchange a few emails with Flashtune. I plan to send my ECU once the riding season is over, because I definitely want access to the Diapason file for the purpose of: #1. Satisfying my curiosity about what exactly they've changed, and in what way. #2. To see if I can smooth out the injector cutoff just prior to the throttle closing. AND, if I can access the area where Diapason programmed the ECU to switch to T-mode on shutdown, I'll change that in a heartbeat :mad: :D

@twinrider: That's good to know...just bolt the stock headers back on for inspection, LOL! Still good to know that flashtune provides a stock file though. If I sell the bike one day, I'll probably return the ECU to stock settings. It also might be fun to flash the stock 'S' mode map into the 'T' mode position for a side by side comparison between that and the Diapason flash.
 

avc8130

Active Member
Joined
Jan 29, 2012
Messages
3,269
Location
North NJ
Tenerator12 said:
It also might be fun to flash the stock 'S' mode map into the 'T' mode position for a side by side comparison between that and the Diapason flash.
That is pretty much what I did. I run an "unrestricted" S mode in my T mode slot. I run a SS mode in my S spot with a quick turn throttle map and the more advanced timing FT suggests.

T mode provides a nice, linear throttle, with timing suitable for regular gas. Perfect for dirt or highway, or bad fuel.

S mode provides a FAST and hard throttle hit, along with a bit extra grunt from the timing. It needs premium fuel and my attention.

ac
 

Tremor38

All roads fair game...all game outta the way!
2011 Site Supporter
2012 Site Supporter
Joined
Apr 28, 2011
Messages
2,562
Location
Aomori, Japan
OK, I was just nosing around in the 'CJM explained' thread, and here is where there's some sort of gap in the info or maybe just a gap between my ears. In the CJM thread, you showed what the CJM did with the throttle restrictions and ignition timing when compared with stock. How did you read a file that is currently in the ECU, or did Chris get that info for you? This sort of thing drives the nerd in me crazy. :p

Thanks.
 

avc8130

Active Member
Joined
Jan 29, 2012
Messages
3,269
Location
North NJ
Tenerator12 said:
OK, I was just nosing around in the 'CJM explained' thread, and here is where there's some sort of gap in the info or maybe just a gap between my ears. In the CJM thread, you showed what the CJM did with the throttle restrictions and ignition timing when compared with stock. How did you read a file that is currently in the ECU, or did Chris get that info for you? This sort of thing drives the nerd in me crazy. :p

Thanks.
Correct. When the whole process started I sent my ECU to FT so they could extract the factory flash and make sure their interface/software would work with the Tenere ECU (essentially that is the same "hardware" as an R1/R6 they already support).

Anyone buying the interface with a STOCK ECU need not send them the ECU as he already has the "stock" file to supply.

If someone has an aftermarket flash, I would suggest sending the ECU to get that flash extracted before over-writing it with a home brew flash.

The interface cannot "read" the ECU, it merely overwrites whatever information is on the ECU each time the user "flashes".

ac
 

Tremor38

All roads fair game...all game outta the way!
2011 Site Supporter
2012 Site Supporter
Joined
Apr 28, 2011
Messages
2,562
Location
Aomori, Japan
avc8130 said:
Correct. When the whole process started I sent my ECU to FT so they could extract the factory flash and make sure their interface/software would work with the Tenere ECU (essentially that is the same "hardware" as an R1/R6 they already support).

Anyone buying the interface with a STOCK ECU need not send them the ECU as he already has the "stock" file to supply.

If someone has an aftermarket flash, I would suggest sending the ECU to get that flash extracted before over-writing it with a home brew flash.

The interface cannot "read" the ECU, it merely overwrites whatever information is on the ECU each time the user "flashes".

ac
OK, so Chris jumpered the clutch switch and extracted the info. Gotcha. Didn't mean to put you through repeating what you had carefully explained earlier. Just wanted to connect the dots, because it started to appear as if there was exeptions to the rule. Thanks.

Sent from my SC-03E using Tapatalk 2
 

avc8130

Active Member
Joined
Jan 29, 2012
Messages
3,269
Location
North NJ
Tenerator12 said:
OK, so Chris jumpered the clutch switch and extracted the info. Gotcha. Didn't mean to put you through repeating what you had carefully explained earlier. Just wanted to connect the dots, because it started to appear as if there was exeptions to the rule. Thanks.

Sent from my SC-03E using Tapatalk 2
Not quite, but sure. The CJM just commands the ECU to make decisions based on its "neutral" gear position.

Think about that for a moment. Let it sink in. With the CJM, the operator is telling the bike to fuel/throttle/ignition/etc based on being in NEUTRAL. A condition that has no load, no wind, nothing. Doesn't seem like the best idea.

ac
 

NoMorBills

New Member
Joined
Sep 19, 2011
Messages
232
Location
Chandler, AZ
So, They did not pull it from the bike with the ECU on the bike with the Jumper in and the bike run on a Dyno?

So they ASSUME it is a neutral MAP!

I never believed the part about the timing anyway. Just didn't make sense.
I still believe the Clutch Jumper only removes the Throttle delay just as Tmode is increased delay and Smode is less delay CJmode is NO DELAY. Has nothing to do with timing or fuel.
Pull a MAP with it hooked to the bike on a DYNO and then post the MAP. Not from the bench.
 

snakebitten

Well-Known Member
2012 Site Supporter
2013 Site Supporter
2014 Site Supporter
Joined
Aug 6, 2011
Messages
5,681
Location
Coastal Texas
avc8130 said:
Not quite, but sure. The CJM just commands the ECU to make decisions based on its "neutral" gear position.

Think about that for a moment. Let it sink in. With the CJM, the operator is telling the bike to fuel/throttle/ignition/etc based on being in NEUTRAL. A condition that has no load, no wind, nothing. Doesn't seem like the best idea.

ac
I understand your point. But your own info shows that other than Wide-Open-Throttle, (in the upper gears?) there wasn't anything "alarming" about that neutral programming.

It might not have been the optimum programming for riding the bike, but for many of us, we enjoyed what we believed was a much more ridable and enjoyable bike in the lower gears.

(I use past tense since I am now Gen2 and no longer need the CJM assist)

We also now know, thanks to you, that a non-flashed bike owner could choose to put a cjm switch on his bike and simply turn the cjm "off" as he goes from urban commute riding to high speed highway.

Having said all that, the ECU programming choices we now have kind of renders the CJM concept obsolete. And it IS progress! But the CJM programming served me well for many months before the Gen2 flash was even available.




Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD
 

avc8130

Active Member
Joined
Jan 29, 2012
Messages
3,269
Location
North NJ
snakebitten said:
I understand your point. But your own info shows that other than Wide-Open-Throttle, (in the upper gears?) there wasn't anything "alarming" about that neutral programming.

It might not have been the optimum programming for riding the bike, but for many of us, we enjoyed what we believed was a much more ridable and enjoyable bike in the lower gears.

(I use past tense since I am now Gen2 and no longer need the CJM assist)

We also now know, thanks to you, that a non-flashed bike owner could choose to put a cjm switch on his bike and simply turn the cjm "off" as he goes from urban commute riding to high speed highway.

Having said all that, the ECU programming choices we now have kind of renders the CJM concept obsolete. And it IS progress! But the CJM programming served me well for many months before the Gen2 flash was even available.




Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD
Well sure, cheap option. Doesn't mean it is a "good" option.

I rode around with the CJM for 13k miles before I got the FT flash. There was no information to know better. Now there is.

I see the CJM as a new "opportunity". I could add a switch and have a 3rd map to go along with S and SS.

In fact, maybe I will do just that. I'll "fix" the WOT timing, and the cruise timing, and do something silly with the throttle. Maybe make it a joke for when I let others ride the bike. "Limp Mode" with a max of 25% throttle or something.

ac
 

snakebitten

Well-Known Member
2012 Site Supporter
2013 Site Supporter
2014 Site Supporter
Joined
Aug 6, 2011
Messages
5,681
Location
Coastal Texas
avc8130 said:
Well sure, cheap option. Doesn't mean it is a "good" option.

I rode around with the CJM for 13k miles before I got the FT flash. There was no information to know better. Now there is.

I see the CJM as a new "opportunity". I could add a switch and have a 3rd map to go along with S and SS.

In fact, maybe I will do just that. I'll "fix" the WOT timing, and the cruise timing, and do something silly with the throttle. Maybe make it a joke for when I let others ride the bike. "Limp Mode" with a max of 25% throttle or something.

ac
Wait a second. That's cool!
You could use the FT tool and reprogram that "neutral" programming, then access that neutral programming as a 3rd "mode" via the clutch switch?

Clever, indeed.
 
Top