colorider
Moderator
Global Moderator
Founding Member
2011 Site Supporter
2012 Site Supporter
2013 Site Supporter
A friend of mine dropped off their copy for me to read the article on the SuperT. After I read it, I knew the mag was a waste as far as MEANINGFULL reviews are concerned.dcstrom said:I'm not a subscriber to Road Runner, but picked up a copy on the way back from the gym the other day. I didn't have my glasses with me... this is the email I sent them. I was TRYING to be nice, but definitely felt ripped off. No response yet...
I bought your April issue for the cover story - your report on the
Super Tenere. I wasted my money.
The cover says "Arizona test ride", the report itself is labelled
"riding impressions", which I would regard as considerably less than a
test. Then to read the meager 2 pages of copy... most of it was lifted
straight from the press release. There is little indication that you
actually rode it at all. I'm not saying you didn't ride it, just that
it doesn't come through in the article.
It's my own fault - I didn't have my glasses with me when I bought the
mag. If I had I would have skimmed the article and known within
seconds that it was being way oversold as a "test" or even an
"impression". Very disappointing.
Very dissapointing.