140/80 of the old style on the left, with 9,800 km on it (22 week of 09) manufacture date and 150/70 right, with 14,200 km (11 week of 11 manufacture date)
The 140 on the right is a little taller and tends to square off quicker
Bad pics. but both the 140 (69H) load rated for 716lbs and the 150 (69T) is also rated for 716lbs and both are tubless rated.
The 140 came off my DL1000 . At the time the 150 wasn't available, so I used the 140 on a ride to Inuvik via. the Campbell Hwy.
The 150 made the ride to the Whitehorse rally and Prudhoe Bay. Both sizes get quite loud as they get down on tread with the 140 loosing its cornering ability a little quicker. Wasn't a lot of diference otherwise to note between the two sizes. Will be using the K60 again as they have really helped in the handling off pavement.
Kind of helps tame the beast, especially the front when in the loose stuff.
Better enter that holiday give away as I need a new set for next summer ::013::
As a side note I would stay away from the 130. The ride to Inuvik was with some KLR's with one of them running the 130 Heidenau, was worn out by the time he got off the Dempster and he had to put on another tire to make the ride home. It starts out with less tread depth than the 140, and didn't stand up nearly as well, even with the less weight and horsepower. And for those KLR owners running the light weight stock tubes, good idea to change them out to a heavier, good quality tube. Some how he managed to tear the steel valve stem part way out of the tube on the front. That was a fun fix 100 km from Eagle Plains. ???