Pdrhound
Active Member
Like to hear some milages and quick performance reviews now that the tire has been out awhile.
Mitas 07+ results
- Thread starter Pdrhound
- Start date
EricV
Riding, farkling, riding...
2011 Site Supporter
2012 Site Supporter
2013 Site Supporter
2014 Site Supporter
You might get better results if you add "Mitas E" to your "07+ results".
I've never run that tire. Results people were sharing when it came out were compared to the Mitas E07 Dakar, and were not favorable in longevity, but ok on handling and traction. It was supposed to be a Big Trailie tire designed for more traction on pavement, and the expense of longevity. A lot of people that tried it, were expecting more tread life and complained to Mitas. I flat told Mitas in a phone conversation that I wouldn't waste my money even trying it, since they fully admitted that it wouldn't last even close to the older E07 Dakar version. I got 17k miles from a rear E07 Dakar and would have never bought anything else again. Then when I needed tires, they were no longer available in the Super Ten sizes.
I've never run that tire. Results people were sharing when it came out were compared to the Mitas E07 Dakar, and were not favorable in longevity, but ok on handling and traction. It was supposed to be a Big Trailie tire designed for more traction on pavement, and the expense of longevity. A lot of people that tried it, were expecting more tread life and complained to Mitas. I flat told Mitas in a phone conversation that I wouldn't waste my money even trying it, since they fully admitted that it wouldn't last even close to the older E07 Dakar version. I got 17k miles from a rear E07 Dakar and would have never bought anything else again. Then when I needed tires, they were no longer available in the Super Ten sizes.
EricV
Riding, farkling, riding...
2011 Site Supporter
2012 Site Supporter
2013 Site Supporter
2014 Site Supporter
To the wear bars. It didn't square off until the end. Much better in that regard than the K60s which always squared off pretty quickly then wear slowed way down. I had a pic, but apparently didn't keep it, as I can't find it now. I did not run it smooth. I probably posted the pics at the time, but likely on the last gen of the forum. Sorry, and yes, probably 80% road use, 20% gravel and two track.
gv550
Well-Known Member
Rear.... I've run 2 E07 Dakar for 30,000 kms each and 1 E07 for 30,000 kms and 3 E07+ Dakar for 20,000 kms each.
Front.... I've run 1 E07 for 40,000, 1 E07 Dakar for 50,000 kms and the 2nd E07 Dakar currently has 63,000 kms. I've never had a + on the front.
None worn right to the wear bars, mostly pavement and gravel roads and some jeep trail riding. 42 psi rear and 38 front.
Front.... I've run 1 E07 for 40,000, 1 E07 Dakar for 50,000 kms and the 2nd E07 Dakar currently has 63,000 kms. I've never had a + on the front.
None worn right to the wear bars, mostly pavement and gravel roads and some jeep trail riding. 42 psi rear and 38 front.
cyclemike4
Well-Known Member
I have ran a mitas E07+ dakar for 10000 miles and could have ran it to 12000. I still have it for a spare if i need it. It was quiet smooth and felt good in all conditions. I was very impressed with it for me and my riding conditions. i like it better than the E07.
I finished my first rear E07+ Dakar at just over 7.5k mi. Yes, I'm harder on tires. Similar riding on the E07 Dakar got me just over 10k mi. I get over 20k on the front e07 dakar, with cupping being the issue.
Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk
Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk
B
ballisticexchris
Guest
I can believe it. The E07 tires weigh 1/3rd to double compared to some of the other tires. And the compound is very hard. Traction, braking, and handling are going to suffer with this tire when compared to a softer compound tread.I can'be believe the distance you guys get out of tires. Impressive
tntmo
Well-Known Member
10,000 miles on the rear tire, 17,000 on the front.
B
ballisticexchris
Guest
I have quite a few dual sport miles on chevron style tread tires. Every single one of them has close to the same handling characteristic. The E07 is not much different than any other tire that has the same tread pattern.
A very important thing to note is a lightweight bike is much more forgiving than a heavy one. I know with 100% certainty that my meager skill level will outride the traction of this tire. I have a certain riding style that I enjoy and feel safe. I am simply pointing out to fellow riders that there is always a compromise when we run certain types of tires.
I would say the + is softer than the E07. My only traction issues are loose rocky inclines, ice, snow and mud.
Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk
So you are saying you have never ran an actual Mitas E07+?
I am just curious as why you would comment on a specific tire when you have zero personal experience with that tire.
B
ballisticexchris
Guest
For the same exact reason that someone who has never had experience with specific round, smooth 100% street tire would comment on the danger of using it in a deep sand wash.
A Mitas E07+ or standard E07 is no different than any other tire of that tread design as far as the handling goes. Both are a compromise tire that is designed to give excellent wear at the cost of traction, braking, and handling. There is no tire made that can give both.
I'm not a mile cruncher. The type of riding I have done (and hopefully will do in the future) demands I get the very best performance as possible. For some performance is rated in longevity. For others, performance is rated in the grip of the tire.
SilverBullet
Well-Known Member
What other tires have a Chevron pattern? I'm not familar with any. What were the Chevron style tires you tried?
Sent from my SM-G900P using Tapatalk
The question wasn’t what you run and/or why. Go back and read the OP’s question.
We all have different riding styles, skill levels, and other factors. I want to hear people’s opinions/mileages has on this specific tire on my specific bike.
To offer your opinion on a stereotypical tire on a different bike doesn’t give much credibility in a review.
B
ballisticexchris
Guest
Kenda 761 (street oriented), Pirelli Scorpion MT90, Pirelli MT60, IRC GP110, Trailwing TW101/TW152, and many many others.
I have personally owned and run an earlier version of the IRC GP110. Many miles on the following: the Kenda 761, MT90, MT60, a few versions of the Bridgestone TW "deathwings", and rode bikes with other tires like the K60 and a few others I don't remember.
For yourself and a few others my statement of facts may not be credible. That's cool. I do think it's important for riders to know advantage/disadvantage of these tires. An individual does not have to actually ride on this tire to know what they are getting themselves into.
SilverBullet
Well-Known Member
I would agree on the MT60 only. The others not really IMO so probably the same for the many many others.
But you're free to your opinion. Continue on...there might still be a last breath left. Lol
Sent from my SM-G900P using Tapatalk
14kmtnman
Well-Known Member
My main issue of the E-07+ is rear wear rate. This is my 4th Mitas E-07 rear (1st + series) and the others have lasted to 12,000 miles. This + one is going to be lucky if it makes to 6000. At 3000 miles I'm right at 50% of the new tread depth. A Tenere buddy made it to a little over 5000 miles before replacing his + rear. He just found and ordered a new old series Dakar as a replacement for the +. I loved the "old" series Dakar tires. They did great in the rain, snow, dirt, rocks and on the road once they broke in after 3-400 miles. I'm thinking about going with the new Dunlop Missions next time around. By the time I need them, others will have chimed in with their experiences on them as well as the mileage stats.