I see the confusion, let me attempt to clarify.
Yes, I started with the 22-041-007 map as obtained from DynoJet.
Then, I modified the map data and reloaded that into position #3 (and then, selected map #3 on the unit front panel switch).
You can see the differences in the map data by downloading the original map file from post #1, above, and then downloading the modified map file from my today's post, and compare the two from within the PC software app.
I did not / have not touched the PCFC (low / mid / high) analog adjustment dials. They remain at default, which is "0" as set by the factory, and confirmed by me at installation time.
So, briefly, the map file differences:
The original 22-041-007, is "rich" across the entire map range, with settings of "8" in every datapoint that DynoJet was willing to fill (they tell you to stay out of certain very low % throttle / RPM range values).
This richness is unnecessary, in my opinion, for most of the datapoints, *for my use case*.
I feel the throttle, and fuelling, is well behaved in most mid-to-upper % / RPM positions. It's the low throttle % / RPM, on /off behavior, that needs correcting, again *in my opinion*.
So, most of the original 22-041-007 map positions in the mid-to-upper % / RPM positions, are now changed to "0" values: No Extra Fuel.
However, the low % / RPM positions are filled with 1-to-3 data values, on a distribution curve across that low range, so that the *extra* fuelling ramps up, then ramps back to OEM "normal". So, they're no longer "8", either, but they do add fuel in the throttle range / RPM range that I'm interested in changing *for my purpose", which is to smooth the abrupt on/off like behavior at low throttle.
So, I did all that adjustments without using the front panel dials. Instead, I did it via map programming.
I'm a 40+ year experience industry, SW developer for embedded systems. This solution was trivial.